J. Bernardes et al., EVALUATION OF INTEROBSERVER AGREEMENT OF CARDIOTOCOGRAMS, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics, 57(1), 1997, pp. 33-37
Objective: To evaluate interobserver agreement in visual analysis of e
ach cardiotocographic event. Methods: Three experts independently divi
ded 16 antepartum and 17 intrapartum cardiotocograms into baseline seg
ments, accelerations and decelerations, according to the FIGO guidelin
es. Baseline segments were further classified as having normal, reduce
d or increased variability and decelerations as early, late and variab
le. Uterine activity was divided into tonus and contractions. Agreemen
t was assessed by the proportions of agreement (pa) with 95% confidenc
e intervals. Results: Reproducibility in assessment of baseline segmen
ts with normal variability, accelerations and uterine activity was acc
eptable (pa=0.56-0.71) whereas that of other segments was not (pa=0.14
-0.45). Conclusions: Analysis of most cardiotocographic events is poor
ly reproducible, even when experts use the FIGO guidelines. This may b
e explained by some still ambiguous guidelines, by eyeball limitations
in evaluation of subtle events, and by the incapacity of busy clinici
ans to assess complex and multiple cardiotocographic events in a syste
matic and disciplined fashion. (C) 1997 International Federation of Gy
necology and Obstetrics.