Piezoelectric activity-based rate responsive pacemakers are commonly i
mplanted with the sensor facing inward. This study was conducted to as
sess the safe and effective rate response of an activity-based rate re
sponsive pacemaker implanted with the sensor facing outward. A compari
son were made to a previously studied patient group with sensor facing
inward. Patient and pacemaker data was collected at predischarge and
2-month follow-up, Two-minute hall walks in conjunction with programme
r-assisted rate response assessment were utilized to standardize initi
al rate response parameter settings for both patient groups. At 2-mont
h follow-up, sensor rate response to a stage 3 limited CAEP protocol w
as recorded, Adequate sensor rate response was achieved for both patie
nt groups. No difference was noted in report ed patient complications
for both groups. A statistically significant difference in programmed
rate response curve setting and activity threshold for the two groups
was noted at 2-month follow-up. Adequate sensor rate response was achi
eved for a patient population implanted with an activity-based rate re
sponsive pacemaker with sensor facing outward. In this orientation, on
e higher rate response curve setting and an activity threshold one val
ue more sensitive were required on average when compared to the normal
sen sor orientation group.