Sa. Zderic et al., MECHANISMS OF BLADDER SMOOTH-MUSCLE HYPERTROPHY AND DECOMPENSATION - LESSONS FROM NORMAL DEVELOPMENT AND THE RESPONSE TO OUTLET OBSTRUCTION, World journal of urology, 16(5), 1998, pp. 350-358
A major clinical issue facing the urologist is urinary incontinence, w
hich may affect up to 10 million Americans; this may cost over 10 bill
ion dollars to manage through either surgery, medical products, drugs,
or the expense of nursing home placement. Cardiac pharmacology has ha
d many years of major funding either at the federal level or via the p
harmaceutic industry in the development of its current armamentarium.
Given the prevalence, morbidity, and mortality of cardiovascular disea
se, this was a logical progression. In contrast, the urologic pharmaco
poeia has lagged behind in part because of a lag in long-term investme
nt in this area. Many of the medications we use in an effort to affect
bladder performance are 20-30 years old. The development of new medic
al options for pharmacologic manipulation of the lower urinary tract d
emands a better understanding of how the smooth muscle operates at a p
hysiologic, pharmacologic, cellular, and molecular level. As urologist
s we face several dilemmas with regard to bladder function: 1. How doe
s bladder compliance change with normal development? 2. How does bladd
er contractility change with normal development? 3. How does the bladd
er's contractile response change following outlet obstruction? 4. At w
hat point does outlet obstruction alter the bladder's passive properti
es? 5. Are there markers that can predict the recovery of detrusor fun
ction after outlet obstruction has been surgically relieved? 6. If nor
mal function is not restored by surgical reversal of outlet obstructio
n, then what medical regimens might be employed to enhance the bladder
function? 7. If one is going to observe patients with benign prostati
c hyperplasia (BPH) over the long term, are there predictors of irreve
rsible detrusor dysfunction?