Objective: the aims of this study were to determine the appropriate co
mposition and purity limits of aluminium alloy radiopacity standards f
or dental biomaterials, taking into account the current status in repr
esentative laboratories worldwide, and to formalise the calculation pr
ocedure for processing radiopacity data. Methods: a series of aluminiu
m step-wedges were obtained from academic and industrial research labo
ratories. These were analysed by energy dispersive X-ray procedures. T
he set of step-wedges were independently characterised for radiopacity
at two University dental schools. Results: the percentage of aluminiu
m together with the percentages of minor alloying elements (magnesium,
manganese, iron and silicon) have been determined as mass percentages
. For each centre, the optical density versus step-height for all wedg
es was judged to fall on a common curve, with the main exception of on
e step-wedge that was found to contain 4% copper, by mass. A suitable
calculation procedure was described explicitly. Conclusion: of the exa
mined representative step-wedges, all but the aluminium-4% copper mate
rial were satisfactory and gave results comparable with wedges of high
purity. Limits should therefore be revised for composition of alumini
um radiopacity step-wedges or test blocks to a more realistic level of
purity. Alloys with more than 0.05% copper or 1.0% iron should be exc
luded and the aluminium content should be at least 98% by mass. In the
calculations deployed for deriving radiopacity as 'equivalent alumini
um thicknesses', an appropriate linear regression procedure should be
employed and considerable care taken in the evaluation of materials of
low or borderline radiopacity, relative to specification limits. The
method described is principally suitable for materials with radiopacit
y greater than 1 mm. For materials with radiopacity less than 1 mm alu
minium, thicker specimens (2 mm) should be used. (C) 1998 Elsevier Sci
ence Ltd. All rights reserved.