Ih. Elkalla et F. Garciagodoy, SALIVA CONTAMINATION AND BOND STRENGTH OF SINGLE-BOTTLE ADHESIVES TO ENAMEL AND DENTIN, American journal of dentistry, 10(2), 1997, pp. 83-87
Purpose: To determine and compare the shear bond strength of four sing
le-bottle adhesives to enamel and dentin contaminated with human saliv
a. Materials and Methods: Prime & Bond 2.1, One Step, Tenure Quik and
Syntac Single Component were evaluated. Ninety-six sound molars were d
ivided into three subgroups for each of the four adhesives. Small flat
areas on the buccal and lingual surfaces were ground in enamel. Small
flat areas on the mesial and distal surfaces were ground on the middl
e dentin of the same teeth. Each adhesive was tested under: uncontamin
ated conditions (Group I), contamination of the bonding surface with f
resh whole saliva for 20 seconds and removing the excess with cotton p
ellets (Group 2), and contamination of the bonding surface with fresh
whole saliva for 20 seconds and rinsing the saliva for 20 seconds befo
re adhesive application (Group 3). After adhesive application, a plast
ic mold was filled with composite, applied to the bonding surface and
light-cured. The teeth were thermocycled (1,000 cycles) and sheared us
ing an Instron testing machine. The results were analyzed using a thre
e-way ANOVA. Results: Saliva contamination of enamel or dentin did not
affect the shear bond strength of the adhesives tested except for Syn
tac SC with contaminated dried enamel. One Step displayed similar bond
strengths to both enamel and dentin; P & B 2.1, Tenure Q and Syntac S
C displayed higher bond strength to enamel than to dentin. P & B 2.1 s
howed significantly higher bond strengths to enamel than the other adh
esives, but there was no significant difference for dentin bond streng
th under the uncontaminated condition.