AGREEMENT BETWEEN SELF AND PARTNER REPORTS OF PATERNAL DRINKING AND SMOKING

Citation
Kt. Passaro et al., AGREEMENT BETWEEN SELF AND PARTNER REPORTS OF PATERNAL DRINKING AND SMOKING, International journal of epidemiology, 26(2), 1997, pp. 315-320
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath
ISSN journal
03005771
Volume
26
Issue
2
Year of publication
1997
Pages
315 - 320
Database
ISI
SICI code
0300-5771(1997)26:2<315:ABSAPR>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Background. We examined agreement between self and proxy reports of pa ternal drinking and smoking behaviour using data collected as part of the prospective, population-based Avon (England) Longitudinal Study of Pregnancy and Childhood. Methods. Information on the smoking and drin king habits of pregnant women's male partners was obtained through sel f-administered questionnaires completed by pregnant participants and b y their partners. For dichotomous indicators (e.g. smoker versus non-s moker), we evaluated self/proxy agreement by calculating Kappa coeffic ients and per cent agreement. For ordinal measures of smoking and drin king amounts, we calculated per cent perfect agreement, per cent agree ment within one category, and Spearman correlation coefficients. Data from 8414 respondent pairs were included in the analyses. Results. Men 's and women's reports of paternal smoking and drinking status were in nearly complete agreement (95% and 98%, respectively). For analyses o f smoking and drinking amounts, agreement within one category remained high (90% and 98% for smoking and drinking, respectively), but perfec t agreement on amount was somewhat lower (81% and 71%, respectively). Per cent perfect agreement on smoking amount was especially low (50%) when non-smokers were excluded. When couples' reports were not in perf ect agreement, women tended to report lower amounts of smoking and dri nking for their partners compared to the men's self reports. Conclusio ns. Our results suggest that women's proxy reports of their partners' drinking and smoking status can be used with considerable confidence i n reproductive epidemiological studies when the enrolment of both wome n and men as participants is infeasible for financial or logistical re asons. Caution is warranted, however, when proxy reports are used for more detailed information on smoking and drinking amounts.