M. Silveri et al., ENDOSCOPIC TREATMENT FOR URINARY-INCONTINENCE IN CHILDREN WITH A CONGENITAL NEUROPATHIC BLADDER, British Journal of Urology, 82(5), 1998, pp. 694-697
Objective To verify, in a retrospective analysis, the effectiveness of
endoscopic treatment (collagen injection) in children with neurogenic
bladder and neurogenic urinary incontinence. Patients and methods Fro
m January 1992 to March 1997, 36 endoscopic collagen injections were p
erformed to treat neurogenic urinary incontinence in 23 patients (mean
age 10.9 years, range 6-17 at the time of the first procedure) select
ed on the basis of clinical status and the patient's motivation, Ninet
een patients were affected by myelomeningocele and four had an occult
spinal dysraphism. All patients underwent a preoperative cystometric u
rodynamic evaluation (without urethral pressure measurement) which sho
wed detrusor areflexia in 12, normal reflexia in one and hyper-reflexi
a in 10 patients. Bladder compliance was considered good (greater than
or equal to 20 cmH(2)O) in 13 patients and low (10-20 cmH(2)O) in 10,
four of whom had detrusor areflexia, Twenty-one children emptied thei
r bladder by intermittent clean catheterization. The mean (range) foll
ow-up was 19.2 (6-54) months. Twenty (group A) and 16 (group B) proced
ures. performed early and late in the series, were analysed separately
to determine any increase in effectiveness with surgical experience.
The evaluation criteria were; the increase in the 'dry' internal (betw
een catheterizations) before and after treatment/s (Delta dry); the pa
tient's and parent's satisfaction; the number of endoscopic procedures
and quantity of injected materials. Results There was an improvement
(dryness of at least 2 h; Delta dry of 1 h) in 13 of 23 patients after
1-3 (mean 1.5) procedures; 10 patients had a 0.2 h increase in Delta
dry after 1-3 injections and none was satisfied. There was no differen
ce in the Delta dry (0.9 vs, 0.7 h) between groups A and B, and/or the
patient's/parent's satisfaction, Success rates differed with urodynam
ic patterns; seven of 10 patients showing no improvement had hyper-ref
lexia and three of the remaining 12 with areflexia had hypocompliant b
ladders, while nine of the 13 showing improvement had an areflexic det
rusor and low-pressure bladders. Conclusion The efficacy of the treatm
ent depends largely on the urodynamic selection of patients (mainly th
ose with detrusor areflexia and good compliance). The outcome may be i
mproved further by increasing the quantity of injected material and wi
th a longer follow-up, performing the procedure again if advisable. A
close postoperative clinical (pad test) and personal observation is ne
cessary to evaluate the outcome and thus optimize the strategy of trea
tment.