This paper reexamines buffer stocks and precautionary savings in the p
resence of loss aversion. We assume that agents are disappointment ave
rse, as in Gul [Econometrica, 59 (1991) 667-686]. We show that the con
cavity of the marginal utility continues to determine precautionary sa
ving, but its effect is of a second order magnitude (proportional to t
he square of the coefficient of variation) compared to the first order
effect (proportional to the coefficient of variation) induced by loss
aversion. We show that a stabilization fund that is rather small when
agents are maximizing the conventional expected utility, turns out to
be rather large with loss aversion. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. Al
l rights reserved.