Results from previous investigations indicate that the implication-rea
lization (I-R) model (Narmour, 1990) of expectancy in melody may be ov
erspecified and more complex than necessary. Indeed, Schellenberg's (1
996) revised model, with two fewer predictor variables, improved predi
ctive accuracy compared with the original model. A reanalysis of data
reported by Cuddy and Lunney (1995) provided similar results. When the
principles of the I-R model were submitted to a principal-components
analysis, a solution containing three orthogonal (uncorrelated) factor
s retained the accuracy of the model but was inferior to the revised m
odel. A separate principal-components analysis of the predictors of th
e revised model yielded a two-factor solution that did not compromise
the revised model's predictive power. Consequently, an even simpler mo
del of melodic expectancy was derived. These results provide further e
vidence that redundancy in the I-R model can be eliminated without los
s of predictive accuracy.