C. Dolinski et al., BUCCAL CAPSULE DEVELOPMENT AS A CONSIDERATION FOR PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF RHABDITIDA (NEMATA), Development, genes and evolution, 208(9), 1998, pp. 495-503
Bacterial feeding nematodes in the order Rhabditida including Zeldia p
unctata (Cephalobidae) and Caenorhabditis elegans (Rhabditidae) differ
profoundly in the buccal capsule parts and associated cells. We carri
ed out a range of tests to determine which buccal capsule parts and ce
lls are evolutionarily homologous between the representative species o
f the two families. Tests included reconstruction of the buccal capsul
e and procorpus with transmission electron microscopy (TEM), nuclei po
sition and morphology using 4,6-diamidino-2phenylindole (DAPI) stainin
g, and cell lineage using four dimensional (4D) microscopy. The lining
of the buccal capsule of Z. punctata and additional Cephalobidae incl
udes four sets of muscular radial cells, ma, mb, me and md, in contras
t to C. elegans and additional Rhabditidae, which has two sets of epit
helial cells (el, e3) and two sets of muscle cells (ml, m2). Cell line
age of a nematode closely related to Z. punctata, Cephalobus cubaensis
, supports the hypothesis that in cephalobids the el and e3 cells beco
me hypodermal cells or are programmed to die. Our findings contradict
all previous hypotheses of buccal capsule homology, and suggest instea
d that ma and mb in Z. punctata are homologous to mi and m2 in C. eleg
ans respectively. We also hypothesize that ma and mb could be homologo
us to primary and secondary sets of stylet-protractor muscle cells in
the plant parasitic Tylenchida.