A. Pinsonneault et S. Rivard, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND THE NATURE OF MANAGERIAL WORK - FROM THE PRODUCTIVITY PARADOX TO THE ICARUS PARADOX, Management information systems quarterly, 22(3), 1998, pp. 287-311
Citations number
56
Categorie Soggetti
Management,"Information Science & Library Science","Computer Science Information Systems","Computer Science Information Systems
Modern organizations are investing heavily in information technology (
IT) with the objective of increasing overall profitability and the pro
ductivity of their knowledge workers. Yet it is often claimed that the
actual benefits of IT are disappointing at best and that IT spending
has failed to yield significant productivity gains-hence the productiv
ity paradox. Evidence is fragmented and somewhat mitigated. This paper
argues that the current state of empirical research results from a fa
ilure to understand the interplay between IT and managerial work. It a
ddresses this issue by analyzing patterns of association between IT us
age and the nature of managerial work in different organizational cont
exts. Fifty-nine semi-structured interviews were conducted with middle
line managers in three large companies: a Bank, a Telecommunications
company, and a Utility. In addition, daily activities and IT usage wer
e logged. The data indicate that the relationship between the level of
IT usage and the nature of managerial work was stronger in the two or
ganizations that were reorienting their strategies (Bank, Telecommunic
ations) than in the one pursuing ifs existing strategy (Utility). It w
as also found that the pattern of the relationship between IT usage an
d the nature of managerial work depended on the kind of strategic reor
ientation implemented by the firm. For instance, in the Bank, the leve
l of IT usage was associated with the amount of time spent by managers
on information-related activities (e.g., reading reports, gathering i
nformation) and on disturbance handling activities (e.g., resolving co
nflicts, managing crises). In the Telecommunications company, IT usage
was associated with more time spent on information-related activities
and less on negotiation-related activities (e.g., discussions with co
lleagues on resource sharing, discussions with subordinates on perform
ance standards). This finding suggests that heavy IT users paid greate
r attention to and spent more time on the relies they performed best w
ith the technology (information-related activities) and may in fact ha
ve been embarking on an over-specialization trajectory.