The impact that the perceived violence of a crime has on jury decision
making has received much controversy lately. Violence may affect juri
es by how it is presented, as in the case of graphic evidence; its evi
dentiary purpose, as in establishing a history of violence in domestic
abuse cases; and in sentencing, when the question of the heinousness
of the crime is raised Many judicial experts argue that evidence of vi
olence may prejudice juries' verdicts. There is also concern within th
e legal community that what constitutes a heinous crime cannot be obje
ctively determined. Psychological research has only just begun to expl
ore these issues. This paper reviews the current legal stare of these
issues, the arguments and questions that have been raised within the l
egal community, and the empirical research that has been conducted thu
s far. The paper concludes with directions for future research that wo
uld improve our understanding of how jurors' perception of violence af
fects their decisions. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd.