Background: Radiation therapy of tumors in the head and neck region is
frequently associated with severe side effects in the oral mucosa whi
ch often necessitate interruption of the prescribed treatment protocol
. In order to compare therapeutic strategies and, more important, in o
rder to perform multi center studies. generally accepted scoring syste
ms have to be applied for uniform documentation of the oral mucosal re
sponse. Methods: Different scoring protocols are found in the literatu
re. The scoring protocols most widely accepted are the CTC classificat
ion and the RTOG/EORTC classification. These are compared with more de
tailed systems. Results: In the CTC classification. grading of stomati
tis is included in the responses of the gastrointestinal tract and emp
hasizes dietary effects. For effects of radiation alone or of radioche
motherapy, the RTOG/EORTC system, focusing on therapeutic intervention
s, has been established. However, there are only minor differences in
the grading of mucositis between these 2 protocols. Based on the RTOG/
EORTC classification, Maciejewski et al. introduced a classification s
ystem with inclusion of the area affected, but also changed the sensit
ivity of the scores. The latter may be confusing if the source of the
system used is not cited in a report. An alternative system was propos
ed by Dische, which in addition to objective morphologic criteria also
includes the symptoms induced by the mucosal response, and hence incl
udes some subjective aspects reported by the patient. Conclusions: For
routine documentation of acute radiation side effects in the oral cav
ity, the German version of the RTOG/EORTC classification can be recomm
ended. In studies with particular interest in oral mucositis. a more s
ensitive scoring system may be applied. In any publication concerning
mucositis, a table or a detailed description of the system used should
be included.