Aims-To simulate the central binocular visual field using results from
merged left and right monocular Humphrey fields. To assess the agreem
ent between the simulation and the binocular Humphrey Esterman visual
field test (EVFT). Method-59 consecutive patients with bilateral glauc
oma each recorded Humphrey 24-2 fields for both eyes and binocular EVF
T on the same visit. EVFT results were used to identify patients exhib
iting at least one defect (<10 dB) within the central 20 degrees of th
e binocular field. This criterion is relevant to a patient's legal fit
ness to drive in the UK. Individual sensitivity values from monocular
fields are merged to generate a simulated central binocular field. Res
ults are displayed as a grey scale and as symbols representing defects
at the <10 dB level. Agreement between patients failing the criterion
using the simulation and the EVFT was evaluated. Results-Substantial
agreement was observed between the methods in classifying patients wit
h at least one defect (<10 dB) within the central binocular field (kap
pa 0.81; SE 0.09). Patients failing this criterion using the EVFT resu
lts were identified by the binocular simulation with high levels of se
nsitivity (100%) and specificity (86%). Conclusions-Excellent agreemen
t exists between the simulated binocular results and EVFT in classifyi
ng glaucomatous patients with central binocular defects. A rapid estim
ate of a patient's central binocular field and visual functional capac
ity can be ascertained without extra perimetric examination.