PHARMACOKINETIC AND SAFETY EVALUATIONS OF KETOPROFEN GELS IN SUBJECTSWITH ADULT PERIODONTITIS

Citation
Hp. Lawrence et al., PHARMACOKINETIC AND SAFETY EVALUATIONS OF KETOPROFEN GELS IN SUBJECTSWITH ADULT PERIODONTITIS, Journal of dental research, 77(11), 1998, pp. 1904-1912
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry,Oral Surgery & Medicine
Journal title
ISSN journal
00220345
Volume
77
Issue
11
Year of publication
1998
Pages
1904 - 1912
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-0345(1998)77:11<1904:PASEOK>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
This clinical trial used a randomized, partially double-blind, control led parallel design to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of the NSAID, ketoprofen (KTP), in gel formulations. Forty-two subjects, age s 35 to 57 years, with generalized, moderate to advanced adult periodo ntitis were recruited and randomized to one of 5 treatments over a 14 1/2-day treatment period: (1) 0.5% KTP gel; (2) 1.0% KTP gel; (3) 1.0% KTP alternate gel; (4) 2.0% KTP gel; and (5) 25 mg KTP capsule (posit ive control). Plasma samples were obtained on days 1 (pre-dosing, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 6 hr), 8 (pre-dosing, 2 hr), 15 (pre-dosing, 2 hr), and 22 ( 7 days post-treatment). Plasma KTP concentrations were determined by m eans of high-performance liquid chromatography. Significant difference s in mean area under the plasma concentration vs, time curve (AUC(0-in finity)) among the groups were detected (p < 0.001), with the 25 mg p. o. capsule exhibiting the largest value (5054 ng-hr/mL), the 2.0% gel exhibiting an intermediate value (2244 ng-hr/mL), the 1.0% gels exhibi ting lower but comparable values (1516 for the alternate formulation v s. 1461 ng-hr/mL), and the 0.5% gel showing the lowest value (736 ng-h r/mL). Significant differences in dose- and weight-adjusted maximum pl asma concentration (C-max/dose/kg) were detected overall such that the 25 mg p.o. capsule demonstrated higher values as compared with the 4 gel formulations (p = 0.001). The 5 treatments exhibited similar mean times of maximum plasma concentration (t(max)) values ranging from 0.6 to 1 hr. Systemic exposures relative to dose and body weight were low er for the gel formulations than for the capsule. The relative systemi c bioavailability of the gels compared with peroral administration ran ged from 54% to 69%.