Testing SNPs and sets of SNPs for importance in association studies

A major goal of genetic association studies concerned with single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) is the detection of SNPs exhibiting an impact on the risk of developing a disease.Typically, this problem is approached by testing each of the SNPs individually.This, however, can lead to an inaccurate measurement of the influence of the SNPs on the disease risk, in particular, if SNPs only show an effect when interacting with other SNPs, as the multivariate structure of the data is ignored.In this article, we propose a testing procedure based on logic regression that takes this structure into account and therefore enables a more appropriate quantification of importance and ranking of the SNPs than marginal testing.Since even SNP interactions often exhibit only a moderate effect on the disease risk, it can be helpful to also consider sets of SNPs (e.g. SNPs belonging to the same gene or pathway) to borrow strength across these SNP sets and to identify those genes or pathways comprising SNPs that are most consistently associated with the response.We show how the proposed procedure can be adapted for testing SNP sets, and how it can be applied to blocks of SNPs in linkage disequilibrium (LD) to overcome problems caused by LD.