Jd. Sobel et al., VULVO-VAGINAL CANDIDIASIS - EPIDEMIOLOGIC DIAGNOSTIC, AND THERAPEUTICCONSIDERATIONS (REPRINTED FROM AM-J-OBSTET-GYNECOL, VOL 178, PG 203-11, 1998), Current problems in obstetrics, gynecology and fertility, 21(5), 1998, pp. 142-151
Although it is the second most common vaginal infection in North Ameri
ca, vulvovaginal candidiasis is a nonnotifiable disease and has been e
xcluded from the ranks of sexually transmitted diseases. Not surprisin
gly, vulvovaginal candidiasis has received scant attention by public h
ealth authorities, funding agencies, and researchers. Epidemiologic da
ta on risk factors and pathogenic mechanisms remain inadequately studi
ed. Most important, standards of care, including diagnosis and therapy
, remain undefined. A conference,vas held in April 1996 to define and
summarize what is known and supported by scientific data in the areas
of epidemiology, diagnosis? and treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis;
but, more important, the conference aimed at defining what is not kno
wn, poorly studied, and controversial. Guidelines for the treatment an
d diagnosis of the different forms of vulvovaginal candidiasis are sug
gested.