Da. Corral et al., DISSOCIATION BETWEEN BONE-RESORPTION AND BONE-FORMATION IN OSTEOPENICTRANSGENIC MICE, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United Statesof America, 95(23), 1998, pp. 13835-13840
Bone mass is maintained constant in vertebrates through bone remodelin
g (BR), BR is characterized by osteoclastic resorption of preexisting
bone followed by ne novo bone formation by osteoblasts. This sequence
of events and the fact that bone mass remains constant in physiologica
l situation lead to the assumption that resorption and formation are r
egulated by each other during BR, Recent evidence shows that cells of
the osteoblastic lineage are involved in osteoclast differentiation. H
owever, the existence of a functional link between the two activities,
formation and resorption, has never been shown in vivo. To define the
role of bone formation in the control of bone resorption, we generate
d an inducible osteoblast ablation mouse model. These mice developed a
reversible osteopenia, Functional analyses showed that in the absence
of bone formation, bone resorption continued to occur normally, leadi
ng to an osteoporosis of controllable severity, whose appearance could
be prevented by an antiresorptive agent. This study establishes that
bone formation and/or bone mass do not control the extent of bone reso
rption in vivo.