THE HEMODYNAMIC-EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ULTRAFILTRATION RATES IN PATIENTSWITH CARDIAC-FAILURE AND PATIENTS WITHOUT CARDIAC-FAILURE - COMPARISON BETWEEN ISOLATED ULTRAFILTRATION AND ULTRAFILTRATION WITH DIALYSIS
Fm. Vandersande et al., THE HEMODYNAMIC-EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ULTRAFILTRATION RATES IN PATIENTSWITH CARDIAC-FAILURE AND PATIENTS WITHOUT CARDIAC-FAILURE - COMPARISON BETWEEN ISOLATED ULTRAFILTRATION AND ULTRAFILTRATION WITH DIALYSIS, Clinical nephrology, 50(5), 1998, pp. 301-308
Objective: The increasing number of dialysis patients with cardiovascu
lar diseases will lead to an increase in the incidence of intradialyti
c hypotension. Intradialytic hypotension is determined by changes in p
lasma volume, changes in vascular reactivity and structural cardiovasc
ular changes. In this study the effect of two different ultrafiltratio
n rates (UF-rate), i. e. 500 and 1000 ml/h, on plas ma volume, extrace
llular volume and arterial blood pressure was studied during different
treatments of 2 hours combined ultrafiltration + hemodialysis (UF+HD)
and 2 hours isolated ultrafiltration (i-UF). Patients and methods: 15
Patients, 8 patients with cardiac failure, CFpts (NYHA classification
III and IV) and 7 patients without cardiac failure (NCFpts) were inve
stigated during a standardized dialysis treatment. Results: The decrea
se in plasma volume and decrease in extracellular volume was comparabl
e both between i-UF and UF+HD and comparable between CFpts and NCFpts
and was only dependent on the UP-rate. i-UF resulted in minor blood pr
essure changes in both CFpts and NCFpts. In CFpts UF+HD resulted in a
significant decrease in systolic blood pressure (SBP) at both UF-rates
while in NCFpts SEP decreased significantly only at the higher UF-rat
e during UF-HD. Although there were no significant differences in hemo
dynamic stability during the different treatment modalities between CF
pts and NCFpts, the decrease in SEP in CFpts at the higher UF-rate dur
ing UF+HD was much more pronounced. Conclusion: From this clinical stu
dy we conclude that differences in hemodynamic stability between i-UF
and UF+HD and between CFpts and NCFpts are not related to differences
in plasma volume preservation. Other factors like different changes in
vascular reactivity and in CFpts structural cardiovascular changes mi
ght be responsible for the observed differences.