ESTIMATING MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY USING A CAUSE AND EFFECT AND RECONCILIATION APPROACH PART 2 - MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY ESTIMATES COMPAREDWITH COLLABORATIVE TRIAL EXPECTATION
Vj. Barwick et Slr. Ellison, ESTIMATING MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY USING A CAUSE AND EFFECT AND RECONCILIATION APPROACH PART 2 - MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY ESTIMATES COMPAREDWITH COLLABORATIVE TRIAL EXPECTATION, Analytical communications (Print), 35(11), 1998, pp. 377-383
Measurement uncertainty estimates are presented for ten analytical met
hods, covering over 45 combinations of analyte, matrix and concentrati
on. The uncertainty estimates were produced using a cause and effect a
pproach published previously. Techniques include gas and liquid chroma
tography, elemental analysis by graphite furnace atomic absorption spe
ctrometry, inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry, inductively c
oupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry, and titrimetry. A range o
f different types of data is used, including quality control data and
method validation studies. The major contributions to the uncertainty
for each method and a brief description of their evaluation are given.
In most cases, a combination of an experimental estimate of overall p
recision and the uncertainty associated with overall bias, measured as
recovery, across representative sample types and analyte concentratio
ns contributes the majority of the uncertainty, although in several ca
ses it was essential to consider additional factors. The uncertainty e
stimates are also compared with collaborative trial results where avai
lable, and with reproducibility estimates obtained from the Horwitz fu
nction.