THE PEPTIDE RECOGNIZED BY HLA-A68.2-RESTRICTED, SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA OF THE LUNG-SPECIFIC CYTOTOXIC T-LYMPHOCYTES IS DERIVED FROM A MUTATED ELONGATION-FACTOR-2 GENE
Kt. Hogan et al., THE PEPTIDE RECOGNIZED BY HLA-A68.2-RESTRICTED, SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA OF THE LUNG-SPECIFIC CYTOTOXIC T-LYMPHOCYTES IS DERIVED FROM A MUTATED ELONGATION-FACTOR-2 GENE, Cancer research, 58(22), 1998, pp. 5144-5150
The identification of naturally processed tumor peptides that can stim
ulate a tumor-specific, CTL response is crucial to the development of
a vaccine-based, immunotherapeutic approach to cancer treatment. One t
ype of cancer in which a tumor-specific, CTL response has been observe
d is squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. In the system investigated h
ere, the tumor-specific CTLs are HLA-A68.2 restricted. Immunoaffinity
chromatography was used to isolate the HLA-A68.2 molecules from the tu
mor cell line, and peptide was eluted with acid from the HLA-A68.2 mol
ecules and subjected to three rounds of separation by reversed phase-h
igh performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC). To determine which fr
actions contained the peptide recognized by the tumor-specific CTLs, a
n aliquot of each RP-HPLC fraction was added to the autologous, B-lymp
hoblastoid cell line, and the cells were then tested as targets for tu
mor-specific CTLs. After the third round of RP-HPLC, mass spectrometry
was used to sequence individual peptide candidates, and a peptide wit
h a m/z of 497 was identified as the active peptide. Collision-activat
ed dissociation of m/z 497 allowed identification of the peptide seque
nce as ETVSEQSNV. With the exception of a single amino acid difference
(glutamic acid versus glutamine as the sixth position in the peptide)
, this peptide is identical to residues 581 to 589 of elongation facto
r 2. The PCR was used to amplify the elongation factor 2 gene in both
the tumor cells and the autologous B cell line, and DNA sequencing of
the products revealed the presence of a heterozygous mutation in the t
umor cells that accounts for the difference between the two peptide se
quences. Although a similar analysis did not reveal the presence of th
e mutation in three additional lung cell carcinomas, this does not rul
e out the possibility that a survey of a larger population of tumor ce
lls would reveal the presence of the mutation at a low frequency. Thes
e results demonstrate the utility of this approach for identifying tum
or-specific antigens that are the targets of a CTL response.