H. Iro et F. Waldfahrer, EVALUATION OF THE NEWLY UPDATED TNM CLASSIFICATION OF HEAD AND NECK-CARCINOMA WITH DATA FROM 3247 PATIENTS, Cancer, 83(10), 1998, pp. 2201-2207
BACKGROUND. The fifth edition of the TNM classification contains a num
ber of changes concerning head and neck tumors. The division of Stage
IV tumors into three subcategories marks a significant expansion of th
e stage grouping procedure. METHODS. In a retrospective study, the cli
nical courses of 3247 patients with carcinoma of the oral cavity, the
oro- and hypopharynx, the larynx, the salivary glands, and the maxilla
ry sinus were comparatively evaluated according to the fourth and fift
h editions of the TNM classification agreed upon by the International
Union Against Cancer and the American Joint Committee on Cancer. The p
articular aim of this study was to lest the prognostic relevance of th
e subdivision of Stage IV, especially for mucosal carcinoma. RESULTS.
In classifying the primary tumor, the most extensive changes were note
d for supraglottic and salivary gland tumors. On the basis of the four
th edition of the TNM classification, the following recurrence free 5-
year survival rates for 3033 cases of mucosal cancer were calculated:
Stage I, 91.0%; Stage II, 78.6%; Stage III, 61.4%; Stage IV, 31.0%. Th
e calculations based on the fifth edition yielded the following: Stage
I, 91.0%; Stage II, 77.2%; Stage III, 61.2%; Stage IVA, 32.4%; Stage
IVB, 25.3%; Stage IVC, 3.6%. CONCLUSIONS, The adequacy of the revised
stage classification in establishing a prognostic hierarchy was confir
med. However, a significant prognostic distinction between N2 metastas
is (Stage IVA) and N3 metastasis (Stage IVB) could not be found. Cance
r 1998;83:2201-7. (C) 1998 American Cancer Society.