S. Benoist et al., LOCAL EXCISION OF RECTAL-CANCER FOR CURE - SHOULD WE ALWAYS REGARD RIGID PATHOLOGICAL CRITERIA, Hepato-gastroenterology, 45(23), 1998, pp. 1546-1551
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The purposes of this study were to assess the relatio
nship between the incidence of recurrence and the pathologic criteria
usually applied to the selection of patients for curative local excisi
on of rectal carcinoma and to determine whether failure to fulfill one
of these criterias is always an indication for secondary abdominoperi
neal resection (APR). METHODOLOGY: From 1982 to 1992, 30 patients with
rectal carcinoma (mean age: 69 +/- 10 years) were treated by local ex
cision (LE). Univariate analysis of the cancer recurrence rate accordi
ng to pathologic criteria was performed. RESULTS: The mean follow-up w
as 57 +/- 40 months (range: 6-145). Five patients (17%) had recurrent
disease (local in 3, distant in 1, and local and distant in I). Two of
the three local cases were successfully treated. At the end of follow
-up, 90% of the patients had no evidence of recurrence, and the rectal
cancer-specific death rate was 10%. Although not significant, tumor p
enetration beyond the submucosa and vessel or nerve invasion were asso
ciated with an increased incidence of cancer recurrence. Tumor size an
d differentiation, and the presence of a mucinous component were not a
ssociated with a significant increase in recurrence. According to the
usual pathologic criteria proposed for curative LE, 20 patients should
, theoretically, have undergone secondary APR. However, 16 of them (80
%) were treated by LE only, and at the end of follow-up, 17 (85%) were
alive without recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The rigid rule of systematical
ly performing secondary APR after LE for rectal carcinoma when one or
more pathologic selection criteria are not met should perhaps be recon
sidered, especially for tumors exceeding 3 cm in diameter, moderately
differentiated tumors, and in incidences when a mucinous component is
present. However, in cases of vessel, nerve or muscular invasion, seco
ndary APR is probably the best choice for cure.