R. Oliver et Jl. Ballester, IS THERE MEMORY IN SOLAR-ACTIVITY, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics, 58(5), 1998, pp. 5650-5654
The Hurst effect is a presumed and unexpected behavior of geoastrophys
ical time series by which these time series have persistence or ''memo
ry.'' The application of Hurst analysis tc, monthly sunspot numbers [B
. B. Mandelbrot and J. R. Wallis, Water Resour. Res. 5, 321 (1969)] yi
elded a Hurst exponent H = 0.86 +/- 0.05, suggesting that solar activi
ty shows persistence and that the underlying responsible mechanism can
guarantee a positive correlation of solar activity during long time l
apses, raising, at the same time, the possibility of the existence of
long-term memory in solar activity. More recently, radiocarbon data ha
ve been used for a similar study [A. Ruzmaikin, J. Feynmann, and P. Ro
binson, Sol. Phys. 149, 395 (1994)] resulting in a constant value H =
0.84 between 100 and 3000 years, which indicates persistence of solar
activity in such time scales. Furthermore, Mount Wilson rotation measu
rements have also been analyzed in the same way [R. W. Komm, Sol. Phys
. 156, 17 (1996)] and the results indicate that temporal variations of
solar rotation on time scales shorter than the Ii-year cycle are caus
ed by a stochastic process which is characterized by persistence. Here
, we have followed the scale of fluctuation approach to show that ther
e is no incontrovertible evidence for the presence of the Hurst effect
in sunspot areas and, therefore, that there is no proof of the existe
nce of long-ten memory in solar activity. [S1063-651X(98)02311-3].