What does the future of property hold? In this Article, Professor Rose
looks for general guidance from law and economics perspectives, and m
ore specific guidance from two dynamic areas in property law, cyberspa
ce and environmental protection. Drawing on those areas, she argues th
at one of the most important challenges facing property law is to find
a place for a type of property that is widespread but underappreciate
d in our law-limited common property. Limited common property is a pro
perty regime falling somewhere between private ownership and public co
mmons; it is property held in common by a group that excludes outsider
s, thus creating property on the outside, commons on the inside. Both
cyberspace and environmental protection demonstrate heated legal confl
icts between individual property and public approaches, but both areas
also illustrate the current failure to take adequate account of the i
ntermediate form, limited common property, In both contexts, Professor
Rose points to examples where limited common property could be especi
ally helpful: among others, in cyberspace, the proliferation of collab
orative artwork; and in environmentalism the management of indigenous
forests and fisheries. However, despite the fact that certain forms of
limited common property exist, they largely remain off the legal prop
erty radar. Professor Rose argues that this failure to recognize limit
ed common properly undermines our ability to manage many types of reso
urces, both physical and intellectual. As society progresses and faces
new challenges, this Article asks us to recognize an age old yet newl
y relevant property concept and to acknowledge its value in the emergi
ng world of property.