The optimal management of patients with lymph node-positive prostate c
ancer remains controversial. The role of pelvic irradiation in patient
s at high risk for nodal involvement continues to be debated. Studies
of prostate irradiation with and without inclusion of the pelvic lymph
nodes show poor outcomes for node-positive patients, supporting the c
oncept that many of these patients have systemic disease at presentati
on, Although no randomized trial has examined the role of pelvic irrad
iation in pathologically node-positive patients,available data fail to
reveal any significant benefit of this approach over prostate-alone i
rradiation. More promising therapeutic approaches involve the combinat
ion of local therapy and sustained hormonal therapy. Series comparing
prophylactic irradiation of the pelvis and prostate to irradiation of
the prostate alone have shown no clear benefit of pelvic irradiation.
Pelvic irradiation may play a role in the treatment of early-stage or
occult nodal disease, although this has yet to be examined. Until pros
pective, randomized trials demonstrate the efficacy of pelvic irradiat
ion in the management of prostate cancer, its use cannot be routinely
recommended. Data support the use of lymphadenectomy in high-risk pati
ents to identify those,vith positive nodes, since these patients requi
re androgen withdrawal therapy.