Atrial electrode position was determined by radiographic analysis in 1
60 patients paced in single-lead VDD for second- or third-degree A-V b
lock, implanted > 1 year with Phymos single pass leads and Phymos 3D p
acemakers. The pacing lead features an atrial dipole with a 30-mm elec
trode interspace. In 44% of patients, the upper atrial electrode was p
ositioned within a band of 20 mm centered at the level of the superior
vena caval insertion (junctional area) and was in the inferior vena c
ava or in the atrium in 35% and 21% of cases, respectively lit spite o
f these different dipole locations, all patients had stable atrium-dri
ven pacing at routine follow-up visits. With the electrode in the junc
tional area, unipolar stimulation of up to 5 V for 1 ms resulted in st
able atrial capture in 63% and 59% of the patients in supine and uprig
ht positions, respectively. With the electrode in the atrium, correspo
nding success rates were 45% and 54%. In the atrium, however, the prev
alence of diaphragmatic stimulation was significantly lower than at th
e junction (10% vs 42% in supine position; 22% vs 47% upright). Though
atrial sensing function proved adequate in a wide range of positions,
these results suggest that the Phymos lead atrial dipole should be po
sitioned within the atrium, as close as possible to the atrial wall, t
o maximize the number of VDD patients who might benefit from single-le
ad DDD pacing.