Fw. Prinzen et al., OPTIMIZATION OF VENTRICULAR-FUNCTION BY IMPROVING THE ACTIVATION SEQUENCE DURING VENTRICULAR PACING, PACE, 21(11), 1998, pp. 2256-2260
(bnormal electrical activation occurring during;ventricular pacing red
uces left ventricular (LV) pump function. Two strategies were compared
to optimize LV function using ventricular pacing, minimal asynchrony
and optimal sequence of electrical activation. ECG and hemodynamics ao
rtic flowprobe, thermodilution cardiac output, LV pressure and its max
imal rates of rise (LVdP/dtpos) and fall (LVdP/dtneg) were measured in
anesthetized open-chest dogs (n = 7) with healthy hearts. The QRS dur
ation la measure of asynchrony of activation) was 47 +/- 5 ms during s
inus rhythm and increased to 110 +/- 12 ms during DDD pacing at the ri
ght ventricular (RV) apex with a short AV interval. During pacing at t
he LV apex and LV base, the QRS duration was 8% +/- 7% and 15% +/- 7%
(P < 0.05) longer than during RV apex pacing, respectively. Stroke vol
umes, LVdP/dtpos and LVdP/dtneg, however, were higher during LV apex (
15% +/- 16%, 10% +/- 12% [P < 0.05], and 15% +/- 10%, respectively) an
d LV base pacing (11% +/- 12% [P < 0.05], 3% +/- 12%, and 3% +/- 11%,
respectively) than during RV apex pacing. Systolic LV pressure was not
influenced significantly by the site of pacing. Biventricular pacing
(RV apex together with one or two LV sites) decreased the QRS duration
by approximately 20% as compared with RV apex pacing, however, it did
not improve Stroke volumes, LVdP/dtpos and LVdP/dtneg beyond those du
ring pacing at the LV apex alone. In conclusion, the sequence of elect
rical activation is a stronger determinant of ventricular function tha
n the synchrony of activation. For optimal LV function the selection o
f an optimal single pacing site, like the LV apex, is more important t
han pacing from multiple sites.