Ka. Bradley et al., THE AUDIT ALCOHOL-CONSUMPTION QUESTIONS - RELIABILITY, VALIDITY, AND RESPONSIVENESS TO CHANGE IN OLDER MALE PRIMARY-CARE PATIENTS, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 22(8), 1998, pp. 1842-1849
Objectives: To determine the reliability, validity, and responsiveness
to change of AUDIT (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test) questi
ons 1 to 3 about alcohol consumption in a primary care setting. Patien
ts: Randomly selected, male general medical patients (n = 441) from th
ree VA Medical Centers, who had 5 or more drinks containing alcohol in
the past year and were willing to be interviewed about their hearth h
abits, Measures: Three self-administered AUDIT consumption questions w
ere compared with a telephone-administered version of the trilevel Wor
ld Health Organization interview about alcohol consumption. Results: O
f 393 eligible patients, 264(67%) completed interviews, Test-retest re
liability-Correlations between baseline and repeat measures 3 months l
ater for four dimensions of consumption according to the AUDIT, ranged
from 0.65 to 0.85 among patients who indicated they had not changed t
heir drinking (Kendall's Tau-b), Criterion validity-Correlations betwe
en AUDIT and interview for four dimensions of alcohol consumption rang
ed from 0.47 to 0.66 (Kendall's Tau-b), Discriminative validity - The
AUDIT questions were specific (90 to 93%), but only moderately sensiti
ve (54 to 79%), for corresponding criteria for heavy drinking. Respons
iveness to change - The AUDIT consumption questions had a Guyatt respo
nsiveness statistic of 1.04 for detecting a change of 7 drinks/week, s
uggesting excellent responsiveness to change. Conclusions: AUDIT quest
ions 1 to 3 demonstrate moderate to good validity, but excellent relia
bility and responsiveness to change. Although they often underestimate
heavy alcohol consumption according to interview, they performed adeq
uately to be used as a proxy measure of consumption in a clinical tria
l of heavy drinkers in this population.