Na. Christakis et Tj. Iwashyna, ATTITUDE AND SELF-REPORTED PRACTICE REGARDING PROGNOSTICATION IN A NATIONAL SAMPLE OF INTERNISTS, Archives of internal medicine, 158(21), 1998, pp. 2389-2395
Background: Since prognostication appears increasingly important in cl
inical practice, especially in end-of-life care, we examined physician
s' experiences and attitudes regarding it. Methods: We mailed a survey
to a national sample of 1311 internists, yielding 697 responses that
were analyzed with multivariate models and other means. Findings were
supplemented by qualitative comments from 162 physicians and by interv
iews with 20. Results: On an annual basis, the typical internist addre
ssed the question ''How long do I have to live?'' 10 times, withdrew o
r withheld life support 5 times, and referred 5 patients to hospice. N
evertheless, physicians disdain prognostication: 60.4% find it ''stres
sful'' to make predictions; 58.7% find it ''difficult''; 43.7% wait to
be asked by a patient before offering predictions; 80.2% believe pati
ents expect too much certainty; 50.2% believe that if they were to mak
e an error, patients might lose confidence; 89.9% believe they should
avoid being too specific; and 56.8% report inadequate training in prog
nostication. With respect to the key concept of ''terminal'' illness,
physicians on average believe that such patients should have 13.5 +/-
11.8 weeks to live, but responses varied substantially from 1 to 75 we
eks. Conclusions: Physicians (1) commonly encounter situations that re
quire prognostication, (2) feel poorly prepared for prognostication, (
3) find it stressful and difficult to make predictions, (4) believe th
at patients expect too much certainty and might judge them adversely f
or prognostic errors, and (5) vary in how they regard the key concept
of being ''terminally ill.'' These observations may have significant c
onsequences for patient care.