M. Hingorani et al., EOSINOPHIL SURFACE-ANTIGEN EXPRESSION AND CYTOKINE PRODUCTION VARY INDIFFERENT OCULAR ALLERGIC DISEASES, Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 102(5), 1998, pp. 821-830
Background: The pathophysiology of chronic ocular allergic disease is
not well understood, An eosinophil infiltrate is characteristic of suc
h disease and eosinophil activity can be related to disease severity a
nd to keratopathy, the most serious complication. Recently, eosinophil
s have been shown capable of cytokine production, particularly in alle
rgic disease, although the disease-specific cytokine spectrum of tissu
e eosinophils is unknown. Objectives: We sought to determine eosinophi
l numbers (absolute numbers and percentage of total leukocytes), cell
surface antigen expression, and cytokine production in conjunctiva in
chronic allergic eye disease and their relationship to corneal involve
ment. Methods: Ultrathin sections of conjunctiva were examined by tiss
ue staining and by 1- and 2-color immunohistochemistry. Results: Eosin
ophil numbers were greater in giant papillary conjunctivitis (GPC) and
vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) and not related to corneal involvem
ent, The eosinophil expression of the cell surface antigens intercellu
lar adhesion molecule-1, CD4, IL-2R, and HLA-DR was greater in atopic
keratoconjunctivitis (AKC) and VKC, the disorders with corneal disease
, than in GPC, in which the cornea is not involved. For most cytokines
, localization to eosinophils was greater for VKC and AKC than for GPC
, RANTES, TGF-beta, and TNF-alpha localized to eosinophils in all diso
rders. Variations in the pattern of eosinophil-cytokine localization w
ere found. In VKC IL-3, IL-5, IL-6, and GM-CSF were prominent; in GPC
IL-5 was prominent; and in AKC IL-4, IL-8, and GM-CSF were prominent.
Conclusions: Chronic ocular allergic disorders affecting the cornea ar
e distinguished from disorders that do not do so by greater expression
of eosinophil surface antigens (which may imply greater cell activati
on) and differences in cytokine localization to eosinophils, These dif
ferences may be secondary to the variations in T-cell subsets or a pri
mary phenomenon, Changes in eosinophil function, rather than cell numb
ers, may be important in clinical variations, such as keratopathy, and
may allow future therapeutic exploitation.