C. Laine et al., COMBINED CARDIAC-CATHETERIZATION FOR UNCOMPLICATED ISCHEMIC-HEART-DISEASE IN A MEDICARE POPULATION, The American journal of medicine, 105(5), 1998, pp. 373-379
PURPOSE: Experts recommend left heart catheterization alone to evaluat
e uncomplicated ischemic heart disease, reserving right heart catheter
ization for specific indications. Yet some centers routinely perform c
ombined cardiac catheterization (left heart catheterization and right
heart catheterization together).SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Using 1992-1993
Pennsylvania Medicare claims for cardiac catheterizations (n = 41,180)
, we examined rates of combined cardiac catheterization for patients w
ith uncomplicated ischemic heart disease for each hospital (n = 73) th
at performed catheterizations. We compared combined cardiac catheteriz
ation rates among hospitals and developed a multivariable model to ide
ntify hospital characteristics associated with high combined cardiac c
atheterization rates. A random sample of cases from the 10 hospitals w
ith the highest combined cardiac catheterization rates were reviewed t
o determine justification, complications, and results of combined card
iac catheterization. RESULTS: Of the 41,180 cardiac catheterizations,
14,177 (34%) were combined procedures. Among hospitals, combined cardi
ac catheterization rates varied from 2% to 98%. Hospital characteristi
cs associated with high combined cardiac catheterization rates include
d having a cardiology fellowship program (relative risk [RR] 1.7, 95%
confidence interval [CI] 1.1-2.7), location in eastern Pennsylvania (R
R 2.5, 95% CI: 1.8-3.5), and volume of catheterizations performed (RR
0.95, 95% CI: 0.91-0.99/100 procedures). For reviewed cases, the most
common justification for combined cardiac catheterization was planned
I revascularization (44%),which is not a specific indication. Only 49%
of cases had at least one specific indication for right heart cathete
rization (range by hospital, 30%-74%). The abnormal findings on the ri
ght heart catheterization rarely appeared to change management. CONCLU
SION: There is wide variation in the practice of combined cardiac cath
eterization, which appears to be related to teaching status and geogra
phic location. The most common justification fbr the procedure was pla
nned revascularization, which is not one of the specific indications s
upported by current literature. (C) 1998 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.