Intermediate-grade lymphomas are defined by the Working Formulation to
include four histologic subgroups: follicular large-cell, diffuse sma
ll-cleaved-cell, diffuse mixed small- and large-cell, and diffuse larg
e cell (Groups D, E, F, and G, respectively). [1] These four histologi
c subtypes were found to have ''intermediate'' median and overall surv
ival features based on outcome analysis of 1,153 patients,vith non-Hod
gkin's lymphomas. Clinicians, however, have come to ''expect'' differe
nt criteria for intermediate-grade lymphomas. Those criteria include a
n aggressive growth rate, a high risk of fatality early in the disease
course without treatment, and a potential for cure using CHOP chemoth
erapy (cyclophosphamide [Cytoxan, Neosar], doxorubicin [Adriamycin], v
incristine [Oncovin], and prednisone). The expectations are summarized
by overall survival graphs demonstrating an initial steep curve, foll
owed by a discernible change in slope, and ending in a relatively flat
fine or plateau representing the proportion of patients cured. [2] Th
at is, an intermediate-grade lymphoma should be an aggressive disease
that is potentially curable with CHOP. In that respect, the Working Fo
rmulation is partly successful, but not by design.