A. Marzo et Nc. Monti, ACCEPTABLE AND UNACCEPTABLE PROCEDURES IN BIOAVAILABILITY AND BIOEQUIVALENCE TRIALS, Pharmacological research, 38(5), 1998, pp. 401-404
Both the US FDA and EU guidelines recommend fundamental procedures for
bioavailability and bioequivalence studies. The use of unacceptable p
rocedures in conducting these studies can in fact complicate drug deve
lopment at NDA or ANDA levels. The most common unacceptable procedures
are as follows: the use of compartmental analysis in calculating C-ma
x, t(max) and AUC, which must be evaluated with the non-compartmental
approach in pivotal studies; the need to use only homogeneous concentr
ations in pharmacokinetic analysis, and to avoid using the sum of vari
ous individual concentrations, e.g. parent drug plus metabolite(s); th
e need to consider plasma clearance in evaluating absolute bioavailabi
lity with dose-dependent kinetics; the need to use the simultaneous fi
tting procedure when drugs and metabolite(s) are considered; the unacc
eptable procedure of either disregarding some experimental data or add
ing simulated data in pharmacokinetic and statistical analysis; and th
e use of the additive model rather than the multiplicative procedure i
n assessing bioequivalence with C-max and AUC. This paper describes in
detail acceptable and unacceptable procedures in bioavailability and
bioequivalence studies, covering operating guidelines and principles o
f pharmacokinetics. (C) 1998 The Italian Pharmacological Society.