ACCEPTABLE AND UNACCEPTABLE PROCEDURES IN BIOAVAILABILITY AND BIOEQUIVALENCE TRIALS

Authors
Citation
A. Marzo et Nc. Monti, ACCEPTABLE AND UNACCEPTABLE PROCEDURES IN BIOAVAILABILITY AND BIOEQUIVALENCE TRIALS, Pharmacological research, 38(5), 1998, pp. 401-404
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Pharmacy
Journal title
ISSN journal
10436618
Volume
38
Issue
5
Year of publication
1998
Pages
401 - 404
Database
ISI
SICI code
1043-6618(1998)38:5<401:AAUPIB>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Both the US FDA and EU guidelines recommend fundamental procedures for bioavailability and bioequivalence studies. The use of unacceptable p rocedures in conducting these studies can in fact complicate drug deve lopment at NDA or ANDA levels. The most common unacceptable procedures are as follows: the use of compartmental analysis in calculating C-ma x, t(max) and AUC, which must be evaluated with the non-compartmental approach in pivotal studies; the need to use only homogeneous concentr ations in pharmacokinetic analysis, and to avoid using the sum of vari ous individual concentrations, e.g. parent drug plus metabolite(s); th e need to consider plasma clearance in evaluating absolute bioavailabi lity with dose-dependent kinetics; the need to use the simultaneous fi tting procedure when drugs and metabolite(s) are considered; the unacc eptable procedure of either disregarding some experimental data or add ing simulated data in pharmacokinetic and statistical analysis; and th e use of the additive model rather than the multiplicative procedure i n assessing bioequivalence with C-max and AUC. This paper describes in detail acceptable and unacceptable procedures in bioavailability and bioequivalence studies, covering operating guidelines and principles o f pharmacokinetics. (C) 1998 The Italian Pharmacological Society.