Scv. Fulford et al., THE FATE OF THE MODERN ARTIFICIAL URINARY SPHINCTER WITH A FOLLOW-UP OF MORE THAN 10 YEARS, British Journal of Urology, 79(5), 1997, pp. 713-716
Objective To assess the long-term outcome of patients who had an artif
icial urinary sphincter (AUS) implanted between 10 and 15 years ago. P
atients and methods Of 68 patients who had an AUS implanted more than
10 years ago, 61 were followed with sufficient detail for analysis. Th
irty-four had a neuropathic bladder with sphincter dysfunction, 15 had
post-prostatectomy sphincter weakness incontinence and 12 further pat
ients had a variety of indications. Results The 61 patients experience
d a total of 58 major complications and 49 have required at least one
revision procedure. Currently eight (13%) patients are satisfactorily
continent with their original AUS in situ and 29 others have a satisfa
ctory revised AUS. Thus 37 of 61 (61%) are continent using an AUS at l
east 10 years after first implantation. Eleven patients died and of th
ese two had a satisfactory original AUS in situ and seven had successf
ul revisions, In two patients the AUS failed but they were considered
unfit for revision. Four female patients were continent and used inter
mittent catheterization after the explantation of eroded AUS cuffs. In
seven patients the AUS was abandoned; two of these patients reverted
to condom drainage and five had continent or incontinent urinary diver
sions fashioned. Thus, if those who died with a functioning AUS are in
cluded, 46 of 61 (75%) achieved long-term continence with the AUS. Con
clusions Despite the high complication and revision rate, these result
s show that acceptable continence rates can be achieved in the long-te
rm, particularly in the male neuropathic bladder and in those with pos
tprostatectomy sphincter weakness. Many of the complications encounter
ed may be less common with the current re-designed models of the AUS.
However, it is essential that both surgeon and patient recognize and a
ccept the likelihood of complications and revisions before using the A
US. The continued use of the AUS where simpler methods of obtaining co
ntinence are inappropriate remains justified.