Sc. Hoffman et al., CONTROLLED TRIAL OF THE EFFECT OF LENGTH, INCENTIVES, AND FOLLOW-UP TECHNIQUES ON RESPONSE TO A MAILED QUESTIONNAIRE, American journal of epidemiology, 148(10), 1998, pp. 1007-1011
Mailed questionnaires are an economical method of data collection for
epidemiologic studies, but response tends to be lower than for telepho
ne or personal interviews. As part of a follow-up study of volunteers
who provided a brief health history and blood sample for a blood speci
men bank in 1989, the authors conducted a controlled trial of the effe
ct of length, incentives, and follow-up techniques on response to a ma
iled questionnaire. Interventions tested included variations on length
of the questionnaire, effect of a monetary incentive, and effect of a
postcard reminder versus a letter accompanied by a second questionnai
re. Response was similar for the short (16-item, 4-page) and long (76-
item, 16-page) questionnaire groups. The monetary incentive did not im
prove the frequency of response. The second mailing of a questionnaire
was significantly better than a postcard reminder in improving respon
ses (23% vs. 10%). It is important to systematically test marketing pr
inciples to determine which techniques are effective in increasing res
ponse to mailed questionnaires for epidemiologic studies.