Gd. Schweiger et al., OPTIMIZING CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT DURING HELICAL CT OF THE LIVER - A COMPARISON OF 2 BOLUS TRACKING TECHNIQUES, American journal of roentgenology, 171(6), 1998, pp. 1551-1558
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a recently develo
ped hardware and software system for CT scanning that generates images
in real time and switches to helical CT scanning by either a visual c
ue or a region of interest (ROI) amplitude threshold. SUBJECTS AND MET
HODS. We randomly and prospectively divided 120 abdominal CT examinati
ons into three groups. Two groups received 75 ml of contrast agent at
1.5 ml/sec. Helical CT scanning began after visualization of the contr
ast bolus arrival in the hepatic veins (visual cue triggering) (39 pat
ients) or after reaching an ROI threshold (automated ROI threshold tri
ggering) (39 patients). A third group served as a control group (42 pa
tients) and received 150 ml of contrast agent at 1 ml/sec. Quality of
hepatic enhancement was assessed objectively and subjectively. Compari
sons were made after stratifying each group into three weight classes.
RESULTS. Errors occurred in 12 (31%) of 39 examinations in the group
with automated ROI threshold triggering. In that group, we found a sig
nificantly (p <.04) lower mean hepatic enhancement in two of three wei
ght categories, and a significantly (p <.04) lower mean subjective sca
n quality in one of three weight categories, than we found in the grou
p with visual cue triggering. CONCLUSION. Optimizing portal venous pha
se helical CT of the liver after a low-volume bolus of contrast agent
and an injection rate of 1.5 ml/sec is best achieved by initiating hel
ical CT scanning after visualizing the contrast bolus arrival within t
he liver rather than after reaching a preset attenuation threshold.