Cl. Kalbhen et al., ASSESSING THE RESECTABILITY OF PANCREATIC-CARCINOMA - THE VALUE OF REINTERPRETING ABDOMINAL CT PERFORMED AT OTHER INSTITUTIONS, American journal of roentgenology, 171(6), 1998, pp. 1571-1576
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the value of rei
nterpreting abdominal CT performed at other institutions when assessin
g the resectability of pancreatic carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Fi
fty-three patients (30 men, 23 women; mean age, 62 years) referred to
our tertiary care institution with newly diagnosed pancreatic carcinom
a had formally reinterpreted abdominal CT scans and available initial
reports. CT was performed at community hospitals (n = 47), university
hospitals (n = 4), an outpatient clinic (n = 1), and an imaging center
(n = 1); reinterpretation was performed by university radiologists wi
th subspecialty expertise in abdominal imaging. On the basis of the in
itial and reinterpretation reports, the patients were categorized as h
aving resectable or nonresectable disease. Medicare reimbursement rate
s were assessed. RESULTS. The initial and reinterpretation reports agr
eed in 36 (68%) of the 53 patients, with the disease of 16 patients co
nsidered resectable and 20 unresectable by both reports. In 17 patient
s (32%), we found discrepancies between the initial and the reinterpre
tation reports. All discrepancies involved the initial report indicati
ng resectability and the reinterpretation report consistent with nonre
sectable disease. Discrepancies were resolved by findings at surgery (
n = 9), percutaneous biopsy (n = 3), dedicated pancreatic CT (n = 3),
dedicated liver CT (n 1), and follow-up abdominal CT (n = 1); the rein
terpretation reports were correct in 16 (94%) of 17 patients. Reimburs
ement for outside CT reinterpretation, repeated abdominal CT, and an e
xploratory laparotomy were estimated at $46.45, $414.47, and $16,996.4
4, respectively. CONCLUSION. Reinterpretation of outside abdominal CT
was valuable for determining pancreatic carcinoma resectability and in
expensive when compared with repeating the CT examination or performin
g an exploratory laparotomy.