USEFULNESS OF CT IN PATIENTS WITH INTESTINAL-OBSTRUCTION WHO HAVE UNDERGONE ABDOMINAL-SURGERY FOR MALIGNANCY

Citation
Hk. Ha et al., USEFULNESS OF CT IN PATIENTS WITH INTESTINAL-OBSTRUCTION WHO HAVE UNDERGONE ABDOMINAL-SURGERY FOR MALIGNANCY, American journal of roentgenology, 171(6), 1998, pp. 1587-1593
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
ISSN journal
0361803X
Volume
171
Issue
6
Year of publication
1998
Pages
1587 - 1593
Database
ISI
SICI code
0361-803X(1998)171:6<1587:UOCIPW>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of CT in determining the causes of intestinal obstruction in patients wh o have undergone abdominal surgery for malignancy. MATERIALS AND METHO DS. We analyzed the CT scans of 55 patients with benign (n = 26) or ma lignant (n = 29) intestinal obstruction that developed after abdominal surgery for malignancy. After calculating the diagnostic accuracy of interpretations by three radiologists, we compared CT findings for ben ign and malignant intestinal obstructions with respect to peritoneal i nvolvement patterns and other ancillary findings. Multivariate logisti c regression analysis was used to determine the diagnostic performance of CT in revealing causes of obstruction. RESULTS. Diagnostic accurac ies of the three radiologists were 67%, 75%, and 78%. CT findings indi cating malignant obstruction were a mass at the site of obstruction or prior surgery, lymphadenopathy, or an abrupt transition zone and irre gular bowel wall thickening at obstructed sites (p <.05). Conversely, the chance for benign obstruction increased when CT revealed mesenteri c vascular changes, a large amount of ascites, or a smooth transition zone and smooth bowel wall thickening at the obstructed site (p <.05). With multivariate logistic regression analysis using two variables (a mass at the site of obstruction or prior surgery and lymphadenopathy) , we calculated the overall accuracy of CT as 84% (46/55 patients). CO NCLUSION. CT is useful in differentiating benign from malignant intest inal obstructions in patients who have undergone abdominal surgery for malignancy. However, CT has limitations in patients not having a demo nstrable peritoneal mass.