P. Lafrance et M. Lapointe, MOBILIZATION AND COTRANSPORT OF PYRENE IN THE PRESENCE OF PSEUDOMONAS-AERUGINOSA UG2 BIOSURFACTANTS IN SANDY SOIL COLUMNS, Ground water monitoring & remediation, 18(4), 1998, pp. 139-147
Washing technologies are currently applied for the remediation of cont
aminated soils. The efficiency of biosurfactants produced by Pseudomon
as aeruginosa strains to mobilize some hydrocarbons sorbed on soils ha
s already been demonstrated. However. few studies have been made to de
fine optimal procedures for the injection of these rhamnolipids in soi
l. This study examines (1) the efficiency of the biosurfactants produc
ed by FI aeruginosa UG2 to mobilize pyrene from a contaminated sandy l
oam as compared to that of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS); (2) the injec
tion procedures (surfactant concentration, pore water velocity, contin
uous or interrupted flow) that might affect the efficiency of pyrene m
obilization using UG2 biosurfactants; and (3) the co-transport of UG2
biosurfactants and pyrene. The UG2 biosurfactants were more efficient
for pyrene mobilization than SDS and had much less impact on soil. The
mobilization of pyrene was approximately proportional to the mass of
UG2 biosurfactants injected for both the 0.25% and the 0.50% (w/v) con
centrations used. Pyrene mobilization was not greatly dependent on eit
her the pore water velocity-about 5.9 and 10.2 inch/h (15 and 26 cm/h)
-or the duration of flow interruption (5 or 15 h). suggesting that mob
ilization was not rate limited under these conditions. The rhamnolipid
s appeared to be weakly retained in the soil. Based on the experimenta
l results, it would be advantageous to use a high UG2 biosurfactant co
ncentration, a high pore water velocity, and possibly a flow interrupt
ion of more than 15 h in order to reduce the injected volume and the d
uration of the treatment required. The 0.25% UG2 biosurfactant concent
ration greatly enhanced pyrene transport and could facilitate contamin
ant recovery.