For operational or research purposes (dispersion computations of radio
active effluents during nuclear emergency situations, simulations of c
hemical pollution in the vicinity of thermal power plants), different
models of passive dispersion in the atmosphere have been developed at
the Environment Department of EDF's R and D Division. This report pres
ents the comparison of the performances of three such models: DIFTRA (
lagrangian puff model, with operational goal), DIFEUL (three dimension
al eulerian) and DIFPAR (Monte Carlo particle model) for the simulatio
n of the first ETEX release, an international tracer campaign during w
hich a passive tracer cloud has been followed over Europe. The results
obtained in this study give model vs, experience differences of the s
ame order as the model vs. experience differences observed during an i
nternational model comparison experiment using data of the Chernobyl r
elease, the ATMES exercise. In addition to the standard statistical sc
ores used in the evaluation of the performances of the transport model
s two asymmetric scores (in contradistinction with the Figure of Merit
in Space) are proposed: ''efficiency'' and ''power''. Their aim is to
separate the two manners in which a model may be wrong: by predicting
presence of pollutant while none is measured or conversely predicting
absence when pollutant is actually detected. (C) 1998 Elsevier Scienc
e Ltd. All rights reserved.