MORPHOLOGY OF SPERMATOZOA IN THE CAUDA EPIDIDYMIDIS BEFORE AND AFTER ELECTROEJACULATION AND A COMPARISON WITH EJACULATED SPERMATOZOA IN THEDOMESTIC CAT
E. Axner et al., MORPHOLOGY OF SPERMATOZOA IN THE CAUDA EPIDIDYMIDIS BEFORE AND AFTER ELECTROEJACULATION AND A COMPARISON WITH EJACULATED SPERMATOZOA IN THEDOMESTIC CAT, Theriogenology, 50(6), 1998, pp. 973-979
When 2 ejaculates are collected by electroejaculation from the domesti
c cat within a period of 10 min the first ejaculate has a higher propo
rtion of abnormal spermatozoa than the second. The reason for this dif
ference is not known for the domestic cat, but in other species long-t
erm epididymal storage results in a higher proportion of abnormal sper
matozoa. The aims of this study were to determine the proportions of a
bnormal spermatozoa in the cauda epididymidis and to ascertain if elec
troejaculation affects this proportion. Therefore the proportions of s
permatozoa in the cauda epididymidis with different morphological abno
rmalities were compared before and after ejaculation. In addition, the
proportion of morphologically abnormal spermatozoa in the epididymis
was compared with that in the ejaculate. Nine privately-owned domestic
cats were anesthetized, and one testicle was surgically removed. An e
jaculate was collected by electroejaculation, after which the remainin
g testicle was ectomized. There were no significant differences in the
proportions of different sperm abnormalities between the cauda epidid
ymidis removed before ejaculation and the one removed after ejaculatio
n. A significantly (P=0.009) higher proportion of spermatozoa with tai
l abnormalities was found in the ejaculates compared with the cauda ep
ididymides (11.1 and 1.6%, respectively), while, as expected, there wa
s a lower proportion of spermatozoa with distal droplets in the ejacul
ates than in the cauda epididymides (35.1 and 75.9%, respectively). Th
is new information contributes to the understanding of the etiology of
sperm defects in the domestic cat, and is of importance when evaluati
ng a semen sample in this species. (C) 1998 by Elsevier Science Inc.