Sc. Goodwin et al., TECHNIQUE FOR REDUCTION OF BILE PERITONITIS AFTER T-TUBE REMOVAL IN LIVER-TRANSPLANT PATIENTS, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology, 9(6), 1998, pp. 986-990
PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to evaluate the incidence of bil
e peritonitis following T-tube removal in liver transplant patients as
a function of the method of T-tube removal. Removal at the bedside wa
s compared to removal in the interventional radiology department with
subsequent placement of a temporary drainage catheter, MATERIALS AND M
ETHODS: From June 1987 through July 1993, 1,105 patients underwent ort
hotopic liver transplantation at the UCLA Medical Center. Three hundre
d patients were randomly selected from this group and their charts wer
e reviewed. Two hundred sixty-three patients who had choledocho-choled
ochostomies over a T tube, and adequate documentation of the method of
T-tube removal and subsequent clinical course were included in the st
udy. Forty-one patients had their drainage catheter removed at the bed
side, and 222 patients had their T-tube removed over a wire in the int
erventional radiology department with subsequent placement of a tempor
ary drainage catheter. RESULTS: Among all patients included in this st
udy, 10.3% had bile peritonitis, Of the patients who had their T-tube
removed at the bedside, 19.5% had bile peritonitis, whereas only 8.6%
of the patients who had their T-tube removed in the interventional rad
iology department had bile peritonitis, This result is statistically s
ignificant (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Placing a temporary drain at the tim
e of T-tube removal in the interventional radiology department results
in a significant reduction in the incidence of bile peritonitis in li
ver transplant patients. The procedure is relatively simple, quickly m
astered, and well tolerated by patients.