STATE-BUILDING AND CAPITALISM - THE RISE OF THE SWEDISH BUREAUCRACY

Authors
Citation
N. Rothstein, STATE-BUILDING AND CAPITALISM - THE RISE OF THE SWEDISH BUREAUCRACY, Scandinavian political studies, 21(4), 1998, pp. 287-306
Citations number
51
Categorie Soggetti
Political Science
ISSN journal
00806757
Volume
21
Issue
4
Year of publication
1998
Pages
287 - 306
Database
ISI
SICI code
0080-6757(1998)21:4<287:SAC-TR>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to answer the following question: When did Swedish bureaucracy arise? That is, to determine a point in time w hen the organizational technology that Weber called bureaucracy became dominant in the process of Swedish state formation, as well as when b ureaucracy finally replaced the feudal form of government based on the authority of nobility and the hierarchical ties of individual loyalti es. The importance of this question relates to the debate on the seque ntial logic of economic and political development. The change from an aristocratic/particularistic to a bureaucratic/universal state apparat us can be understood as a change from despotic to infrastructural stat e power. Most empirical material indicates that, in terms of instituti onal structure, the transition to a bureaucratic administration starte d in the 1850s. Contrary to what most Swedish historians have argued, the Swedish state remained feudal and particularistic all they way up to the mid-19th century. If any particular decade is key to this trans formation, it would be the 1870s. By then the last of the noble privil eges had disappeared, a uniform salary system had been introduced, and the various state apparatuses had begun reorganizing toward a higher level of efficiency and rationality.