A COMPARISON OF PSEUDO-MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD AND ASYMPTOTICALLY DISTRIBUTION-FREE DYNAMIC FACTOR-ANALYSIS PARAMETER-ESTIMATION IN FITTING COVARIANCE-STRUCTURE MODELS TO BLOCK-TOEPLITZ MATRICES REPRESENTING SINGLE-SUBJECT MULTIVARIATE TIME-SERIES
Pcm. Molenaar et Jr. Nesselroade, A COMPARISON OF PSEUDO-MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD AND ASYMPTOTICALLY DISTRIBUTION-FREE DYNAMIC FACTOR-ANALYSIS PARAMETER-ESTIMATION IN FITTING COVARIANCE-STRUCTURE MODELS TO BLOCK-TOEPLITZ MATRICES REPRESENTING SINGLE-SUBJECT MULTIVARIATE TIME-SERIES, Multivariate behavioral research, 33(3), 1998, pp. 313-342
The study of intraindividual variability pervades empirical inquiry in
virtually all subdisciplines of psychology. The statistical analysis
of multivariate time-series data - a central product of intraindividua
l investigations - requires special modeling techniques. The dynamic f
actor model (DFM), which is a generalization of the traditional common
factor model, has been proposed by Molenaar (1985) for systematically
extracting information from multivariate time-series via latent varia
ble modeling. Implementation of the DFM model has taken several forms,
one of which involves specifying it as a covariance-structure model a
nd estimating its parameters from a block-Toeplitz matrix derived from
the multivariate time-series. We compare two methods for estimating D
FM parameters within a covariance-structure framework - pseudo-Maximum
Likelihood (p-ML) and Asymptotically Distribution Free (ADF) estimati
on - by means of a Monte Carlo simulation. Both methods appear to give
consistent model parameter estimates of comparable precision, but onl
y the ADF method gives standard errors and chi-square statistics that
appear to be consistent. The relative ordering of the values of all es
timates appears to be very similar across methods. When the manifest t
ime-series is relatively short, the two methods appear to perform abou
t equally well.