An important segment of writings on postindustrialization is distinctl
y utopian in stressing the greater mastery and control made possible b
y recent innovations in information technology. The utopian theme unde
rscores the technical outcomes of innovations and highlights their ben
efits for ameliorating social problems. By contrast, our work suggests
that many of the social problems in contemporary society are a conseq
uence of recent innovations in information technology. We argue that p
ostindustrial theorists are correct in stressing mastery over certain
technical problems but incorrect in slighting the destabilizing effect
innovations have on organizations and the markets in which these orga
nizations participate. These destabilizing effects complicate organiza
tional strategies by increasing market risk and uncertainty. Since mos
t organizations are risk aversive, social problems are created as orga
nizations externalize their costs and pass along risk to other, more d
ependent actors. Illustrations from two institutions, politics and the
economy, indicate that many postindustrial innovations are associated
with heightened competition as well as greater risk and uncertainty a
cross the institutional order. We conclude that postindustrial technol
ogy introduces no net gain in managing the complexities of the social
world. Risk and control are both integral to technological innovation
and constitute the paradox of postindustrialization.