A RANDOMIZED BIOMECHANICAL STUDY OF ZONE-II HUMAN FLEXOR TENDON REPAIRS ANALYZED IN A LINEAR-MODEL

Komanduri et al showed that dorsal tendon repairs using Kessler and Bu nnell techniques were stronger than the standard volar repair (J Hand Surg 1996;21A:605-611). They concluded that when testing in the anatom ic curvilinear mode, the differences in strength were due to tension b anding. Soejima et al challenged that concept by stating that the diff erence in strength was in the biomechanics of the dorsal tendon itself (J Hand Surg 1995;20A:801-807). We set out to confirm Soejima et al's theory by using more core suture techniques. We compared the tensile strength at 2-mm gap and the ultimate tensile strength of Kessler, Str ickland, Robertson, and modified Becker sutures. Ten repairs of each s uture type were placed either dorsally or volarly in matched human cad aver flexor tendons. There was no statistical difference between volar and dorsal placement for either maximum tensile force or force at 2-m m gap. Our study does not confirm Soejima et al's in any of the four s uturing techniques. (J Hand Surg 1998;23A:1043-1045. Copyright (C) 199 8 by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand.).