We examine the interactions between different institutional arrangemen
ts in a general equilibrium model of a modernizing economy. There is a
modern sector, where productivity is high but information asymmetries
are. large, and a traditional sector where productivity is low but in
formation asymmetries are small. Consequently, agency costs in the mod
ern sector make consumption lending difficult, while such lending is r
eadily done in the traditional sector. The resulting trade-off between
credit availability and productivity implies that not everyone will m
ove to the modem sector. In fact, the laissez-faire level of moderniza
tion may fail to maximize net social surplus. This situation may also
hold in the long run: in a dynamic version of the model, a ''trickle-d
own'' effect links the process of modernization with reduction in mode
rn sector agency costs. This effect may be too weak and the economy ma
y get stuck in a trap and never fully modernize. The two-sector struct
ure also yields a natural theoretical testing ground for the Kuznets i
nverted-U hypothesis: we show that even within the ''sectoral shifting
'' class of models, this phenomenon is not robust to small changes in
model specification.