A BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION OF GRAFT LOADING CHARACTERISTICS FOR ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISKECTOMY AND FUSION - A COMPARISON OF TRADITIONAL AND REVERSE GRAFTING TECHNIQUES
Jc. Wang et al., A BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION OF GRAFT LOADING CHARACTERISTICS FOR ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISKECTOMY AND FUSION - A COMPARISON OF TRADITIONAL AND REVERSE GRAFTING TECHNIQUES, Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 23(22), 1998, pp. 2450-2454
Study Design. A biomechanical study of graft loading characteristics f
or anterior cervical discectomy and fusion comparing the amount and lo
cation of transmitted forces, Objectives. To evaluate the difference b
etween traditional iliac grafting and reverse iliac grafting used for
anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the amount and location of
forces applied to the grafts. Summary of Background Data. Traditional
fusion after anterior cervical discectomy involves placing a tricortic
al iliac crest strut into the disc space with the cortical portion fac
ing anteriorly and the cancellous portion posteriorly. Recently, rever
se iliac grafting has been introduced in which the cortical portion is
placed in the posterior disc space. There is no biomechanical or clin
ical study showing an advantage of using one technique over the other.
This study is the first to produce data supporting one technique as b
iomechanically superior. Methods. Five fresh cadaveric cervical spines
were tested using pressure-sensitive film placed between the bone gra
ft and the vertebral endplate after an anterior discectomy was perform
ed. A 10-pound load was applied to the cervical spine at predetermined
sagittal positions. Recordings were made at neutral, 10 degrees of fl
exion, and 10 degrees and 20 degrees of extension after traditional an
d reverse iliac grafting. Results. Graft forces were identical in both
traditional and reverse grafting in the location and amount of force
applied. Total force increased to the maximum in flexion and gradually
decreased in more extended positions. The location of force was compl
etely anterior with flexion, moving to the posterior portion of the gr
aft with positions of extension. With 10 degrees of flexion , the load
applied to the grafts was 20.4 N. In the neutral position, the load w
as 12 N. The loads decreased further with extension with forces of 11
N in 10 degrees extension, and 4 N in 20 degrees of extension, Conclus
ions. The optimal position of the tricortical iliac graft for an anter
ior cervical fusion is with the stronger cortical portion placed in th
e anterior disc space and the weaker cancellous portion placed in the
posterior disc space. In this traditional position, the graft will bes
t resist the loads applied to the cervical spine, preventing graft col
lapse.