PRELIMINARY-REPORT OF THE ASIAN-OCEANIAN CLINICAL ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATION RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING CISPLATIN AND EPIRUBICIN FOLLOWED BY RADIOTHERAPY VERSUS RADIOTHERAPY ALONE IN THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH LOCOREGIONALLY ADVANCED NASOPHARYNGEAL CARCINOMA

Citation
Dtt. Chua et al., PRELIMINARY-REPORT OF THE ASIAN-OCEANIAN CLINICAL ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATION RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING CISPLATIN AND EPIRUBICIN FOLLOWED BY RADIOTHERAPY VERSUS RADIOTHERAPY ALONE IN THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH LOCOREGIONALLY ADVANCED NASOPHARYNGEAL CARCINOMA, Cancer, 83(11), 1998, pp. 2270-2283
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology
Journal title
CancerACNP
ISSN journal
0008543X
Volume
83
Issue
11
Year of publication
1998
Pages
2270 - 2283
Database
ISI
SICI code
0008-543X(1998)83:11<2270:POTACO>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
BACKGROUND. The aim of this trial was to compare the outcome achieved with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy to that achieve d with radiotherapy alone for patients with locoregionally advanced un differentiated or poorly differentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) meeting one of the following criteria: Ho's T3 disease, Ho's N2-N3 di sease, or lymph node size greater than or equal to 3 cm. METHODS. Betw een September 1989 and August 1993, 334 patients were enrolled in the study, with equal numbers of patients randomized to the neoadjuvant ch emotherapy arm (CT arm) and the radiotherapy arm (RT arm). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisting of 2-3 cycles of cisplatin (60 mg/m(2) on Day 1) and epirubicin (110 mg/m(2) on Day 1) followed by radiotherapy was given to the CT arm. For radiotherapy, a dose of 66-74 gray (Gy) (med ian, 71 Gy) was delivered to the primary tumor and 60-76 Gy (median, 6 6 Gy) to the neck. Two hundred eighty-six eligible patients completed the treatment and were evaluable for treatment response (134 in the CT arm, 152 in the RT arm). All patients were included in the survival a nalysis based on the intention to treat. The median follow-up was 30 m onths for the whole cohort and 41 months for the surviving patients. R ESULTS. Analysis of the 334 patients based on the intention to treat s howed no significant difference in relapse free survival (RFS) or over all survival (OS) between the 2 treatment arms (3-year RFS rate: 48% i n the (ST arm vs. 42% in the RT arm, P = 0.45; 3-year OS rate: 78% vs. 71%, P = 0.57). In an efficacy analysis based on only the 286 evaluab le patients, a trend of improved RFS favoring the CT arm was observed (3-year RFS rate: 58% vs. 46%, P = 0.053), with again no significant d ifference in OS (3-year OS rate: 80% vs. 72%, P = 0.21). In the subgro up of 49 patients with bulky neck lymph nodes >6 cm, improved RFS (3-y ear RFS rate: 63% vs. 28%, P = 0.026) and OS (3-year OS rate: 73% vs. 37%, P = 0.057) were observed, favoring the CT arm. CONCLUSIONS. This multicenter randomized study did not demonstrate any benefit with the addition of cisplatin-epirubicin neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma; therefore rout ine administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to this target group ca nnot be recommended. Although the overall incidence of recurrence was reduced with the addition of chemotherapy in the efficacy analysis, th e overall survival was not affected. A more effective chemotherapy reg imen, the selection of an appropriate target group, and the use of an alternative strategy for combining chemoradiotherapy should be explore d in future trials. (C) 1998 American Cancer Society.